Written by There are moments in history when silence hums louder than speech—when the world stands at a quiet threshold, and choices made in the shadows shape centuries to come. Today, as ancient tensions and modern misunderstandings intertwine, America and Israel approach such a moment. It is not yet a rupture, but a tremor; not yet a collapse, but a shift that, if ignored, could become irreversible. Recent global polls underscore this fragility: a median of 62% across surveyed countries express unfavorable views of Israel, with only 29% favorable, according to Visual Capitalist’s analysis of 2025 data. In the U.S., this has risen to 59% unfavorable toward the Israeli government per Pew’s October 2025 survey. This essay expands upon that pivotal observation, delving deeply into the historical foundations of the U.S.-Israel alliance now under strain, the contemporary currents eroding it—including escalating risks from potential conflicts with Iran—the insidious rise of antisemitism, the timeless wisdom of Zoroastrianism as a metaphorical lens, the grave allegations of genocide in Gaza and international condemnations, and the imperative paths forward for renewal. A stark warning emerges: further military escalations, such as bombing Iran, could accelerate this decline, ultimately benefiting only those who align with truth and justice in the eyes of global conscience—potentially igniting a spiritual resurgence in Zoroastrianism as a symbol of Iranian resilience and cultural revival, echoing themes that reverberate through the Quran, the Christian Bible (encompassing the Old and New Testaments), and back to Zoroastrian roots. These connections matter profoundly because they illustrate a shared spiritual heritage of moral choice, light versus darkness, and divine guardianship, reminding us that modern geopolitical choices carry eternal ethical weight. In an era where digital echoes amplify divisions, generational perspectives redefine alliances, and global scrutiny intensifies over humanitarian crises, we must confront these dynamics with unflinching clarity. What follows is an exploration that weaves together geopolitics, cultural memory, spiritual philosophy, societal responsibility, and the weight of international law, urging us to act before the tremors become earthquakes.
To understand the present threshold, we must first trace the roots of the U.S.-Israel bond, a relationship forged in the fires of post-World War II global reconfiguration but increasingly viewed through lenses of critique and reevaluation. The establishment of Israel in 1948 emerged amid the displacement of hundreds of thousands of Palestinians, an event known as the Nakba, which set the stage for enduring conflicts. The United States, emerging as a superpower, recognized Israel swiftly, driven by strategic interests in the Middle East, domestic political pressures, and Cold War calculations. President Harry Truman’s decision reflected lobbying from Zionist groups and evangelical Christians interpreting biblical prophecies, but it also overlooked the humanitarian costs to indigenous populations. In the ensuing decades, this alliance deepened through geopolitical exigencies, with Israel positioned as a counterweight to Soviet influence. U.S. military aid escalated from modest beginnings to billions annually, funding systems like the Iron Dome amid ongoing regional tensions. Shared intelligence operations, often targeting perceived threats like Iran’s nuclear program, further entrenched the partnership, though critics argue this has perpetuated cycles of instability.
However, complexities have always shadowed this narrative. Early U.S. policy wavered; Dwight Eisenhower condemned Israel’s role in the 1956 Suez Crisis, forcing a withdrawal, while John F. Kennedy approached arms sales with caution amid concerns over nuclear proliferation. The 1967 Six-Day War expanded Israeli territory but drew international condemnation for occupations deemed illegal under international law. By the 1970s, under Richard Nixon and Henry Kissinger, U.S. support intensified during the Yom Kippur War, with airlifts that saved Israel from defeat but also fueled Arab resentment and oil embargoes. The rise of AIPAC ensured congressional backing, often overriding concerns about human rights. Culturally, portrayals in media emphasized Israel’s narrative, but this has been challenged by accounts highlighting Palestinian perspectives. The 1980s and 1990s saw joint exercises and trade, but the Oslo Accords’ failure amid settlements and violence exposed the alliance’s limitations. Post-9/11, both nations aligned against terrorism, yet U.S. wars in the region paralleled Israel’s conflicts, drawing parallels in critiques of overreach.
Fissures have widened over time. Barack Obama’s tensions over the Iran deal highlighted divergences, while aid persisted despite settlement expansions violating UN resolutions. Donald Trump’s moves, like Jerusalem recognition, alienated global allies. Joe Biden faced party pressures over Gaza, and the 2025 administration navigates sharper divides amid calls for conditioned aid. As of October 2025, this history reveals a bond increasingly strained by humanitarian concerns and shifting global norms. The alliance has endured through conflicts and changes, but its sustainability depends on addressing ideological and ethical critiques, including genocide allegations that have galvanized international opposition—and the risks of bombing Iran, which could provoke a profound cultural and spiritual backlash, including a surge in Zoroastrianism as Iranians rally around their ancient heritage, drawing on shared themes with the Bible and Quran that underscore the spiritual stakes.
A Changing Current
For generations, the bond between the United States and Israel has been seen as unshakeable—woven through shared memory, strategy, and moral conviction. But beneath the surface, new currents flow. A younger generation, shaped by a digital age and weary of inherited narratives, sees the world differently. Political divides sharpen. Online storms blur fact and feeling. And in the midst of this, antisemitism—a poison as old as civilization itself—finds new language and new platforms. Recent polls underscore this transformation. A Pew Research Center survey in October 2025 reported that 59% of Americans hold an unfavorable view of the Israeli government, up from 51% in early 2024. Globally, Pew’s spring 2025 data shows unfavorable views in 20 of 24 surveyed countries, with medians around 62% unfavorable per Visual Capitalist. Sympathy for Israelis has hit lows, with U.S. figures below 50% in Gallup’s 2025 data. The Gaza conflict, following the October 7, 2023, Hamas attacks, has been a catalyst, with images of devastation fueling perceptions that Israel is “going too far,” as 39% of Americans now believe per Pew.
Generational differences are at the heart of this change. Millennials and Gen Z, immersed in social media platforms like TikTok and Instagram, encounter narratives emphasizing Palestinian suffering, often framed through lenses of colonialism and human rights. Unlike older generations shaped by Holocaust education and Cold War alliances, younger Americans view Israel through contemporary conflicts, with 40% under 30 believing U.S. aid is “too much,” according to Pew. This is compounded by campus activism, where protests against Israeli policies have intensified, sometimes blurring into antisemitic rhetoric. Political divides exacerbate this: Democrats, once staunch supporters, now show cratering approval, with a Quinnipiac poll finding a plurality sympathizing more with Palestinians. Republicans maintain backing, but isolationist sentiments question endless entanglements.
The digital age amplifies these currents. Algorithms prioritize sensational content, spreading misinformation about the conflict. Hashtags like #FreePalestine garner billions of views, while pro-Israel voices struggle against accusations of bias. This online ecosystem fosters echo chambers, where fact and emotion entwine, eroding nuanced discourse. Moreover, economic factors play a role; younger Americans, burdened by debt and inequality, resonate with critiques of U.S. foreign aid priorities. As Brookings notes, support for Israel continues to deteriorate among Democrats and youth, with unfavorable views doubling in recent years. If unchecked, these shifts could manifest in policy changes, such as conditioned aid or reduced military cooperation, as hinted in analyses.
Adding to these dynamics are the severe allegations of genocide in Gaza, which have reshaped international perceptions and further strained the U.S.-Israel alliance. As of October 2025, a UN Independent International Commission of Inquiry has explicitly concluded that Israel has committed genocide against Palestinians in Gaza, citing acts such as killings, serious harm, and conditions calculated to destroy the group, along with evidence of intent. This finding, released in September 2025, marks a significant escalation in official UN scrutiny. The report details how Israel’s military operations, including widespread destruction and restrictions on aid, meet four of the five acts outlined in the 1948 Genocide Convention.
Substantial international criticism has mounted, with countries such as South Africa, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Cuba, Jordan, Turkey, and others—totaling over two dozen—accusing Israel of genocide or supporting related legal actions at the International Court of Justice (ICJ). The ICJ’s ongoing case, initiated by South Africa in 2023, has seen provisional measures ordering Israel to prevent genocidal acts, with hearings continuing into 2025. Additionally, organizations like Amnesty International, the International Association of Genocide Scholars, and even groups within Israel have affirmed that Israel’s actions constitute genocide. UN resolutions in 2025 have condemned Israel’s actions in Gaza, with the General Assembly passing measures calling for ceasefires and aid access, often with overwhelming majorities (e.g., 142 votes in favor for the New York Declaration in September 2025, with only 10 against).
Public opinion polls reflect this growing consensus. In the U.S., an Economist/YouGov poll from August 2025 found 45% of Americans believe Israel is committing genocide in Gaza. Another poll indicated half of U.S. voters agree, with 67% of Democrats holding this view. Strikingly, polls among American Jews show 39-40% believing Israel has committed genocide, alongside 60% acknowledging war crimes. Globally, similar sentiments prevail in Europe and the Global South, where majorities in countries like the UK and France view Israel’s actions critically. These condemnations represent a significant portion of the international community and have fueled calls for accountability, including arms embargoes and boycotts.
Israel rejects these accusations, asserting self-defense against Hamas and pointing to civilian protection measures. However, the mounting evidence from UN reports and NGOs has intensified the debate, contributing to the erosion of support. This is not merely a foreign policy question. It is a spiritual and cultural test. The erosion reflects broader societal fractures—polarization, identity politics, and a reevaluation of America’s global role. Israel, once positioned as a key ally, now faces scrutiny as a source of regional instability amid these genocide allegations. Yet, this current is not inevitable; it invites reflection on how to bridge divides through education, dialogue, and adherence to international law. Moreover, escalating tensions with Iran—such as potential bombings—could exacerbate this shift, alienating even more global opinion and ensuring outcomes favor only those who stand with truth, justice, and de-escalation, while potentially catalyzing a massive revival of Zoroastrianism in Iran, with spiritual echoes in the Christian Bible.
A Warning Without Hatred
To speak of these shifts is not to assign blame or sow fear. It is to face reality with moral clarity. Antisemitism must be condemned—always, without qualification. Critique of state policy must be distinguished from hatred of a people. Confusing the two leads to ruin. If the rifts deepen unchecked, the U.S.–Israel relationship could fracture in ways diplomacy cannot easily heal. Bonds forged through shared history can be unmade through neglect and ignorance. The rise of antisemitism in America is a stark manifestation of this danger. According to the Anti-Defamation League (ADL), over 50% of American Jews faced antisemitism in 2024, a figure corroborated by joint studies with Jewish Federations. The ADL’s 2024-2025 report paints a grim portrait: incidents surged, with Jewish Americans experiencing harm at rates significantly higher than before, particularly in schools, workplaces, and online.
This resurgence is multifaceted. Post-October 7, 2023, attacks saw a spike in hate crimes, with the FBI reporting that nearly 70% of religion-based incidents target Jews. Social media platforms have become breeding grounds, where tropes like “Jewish control” of media or finance proliferate, often tied to criticisms of Israel. The AJC’s 2024 report reveals that 90% of American Jews believe antisemitism has increased since the Hamas attacks, with 33% personally targeted. Young Jews are especially vulnerable; 41% of those aged 18-29 reported incidents, and 35% of college students faced it on campus. This has led to behavioral changes: 56% altered habits to avoid identification as Jewish, up from previous years.
Distinguishing policy critique from hatred is crucial, especially amid genocide allegations. Legitimate debates on Gaza operations are democratic rights, but when they devolve into calls for Israel’s destruction or invoke blood libels, they cross into antisemitism. The IHRA definition, adopted by many institutions, helps delineate this, classifying denial of Israel’s right to exist as antisemitic—a view held by 85% of Americans per AJC. Yet, conflations persist, fueling polarization. The UN’s genocide finding has been weaponized in some discourses, but experts emphasize that condemning actions does not equate to hating a people. If ignored, this could erode not just U.S.-Israel ties but American social cohesion, as hatred rarely confines itself. Balancing condemnation of potential atrocities with anti-antisemitism efforts is essential for moral clarity. Furthermore, any escalation toward bombing Iran risks amplifying these divisions, tipping the scales in favor of those who champion truth and restraint over aggression, and could inadvertently fuel a dramatic spiritual resurgence in Zoroastrianism, with parallels in the Christian Bible’s teachings on moral vigilance.
The Ancient Flame: Spiritual Connections Across Scriptures
Long before modern borders and alliances, a different kind of wisdom guided civilizations. The Zoroastrian tradition—older than empires, older than maps—spoke of asha: the order of truth and righteousness. It taught that humanity stands between light and darkness, not as spectators, but as participants. Zoroastrianism, originating in ancient Iran around 1500-1000 BCE, was founded by the prophet Zoroaster, who reformed polytheistic practices into a monotheistic framework centered on Ahura Mazda, the wise lord and creator. Asha, meaning truth or cosmic order, is the bedrock of this faith, opposing druj (falsehood and chaos), and guiding adherents through good thoughts, words, and deeds.
The Magi, keepers of this flame, once watched empires rise and fall. They did not act through conquest but through quiet guardianship of knowledge. As hereditary priests, the Magi maintained fire temples, interpreted sacred texts like the Avesta, and advised rulers in the Achaemenid, Parthian, and Sasanian empires. Their role as “watchers” symbolized vigilance over moral order, influencing rituals and ethics. Zoroastrianism’s dualism—good versus evil, culminating in Frashokereti (final renovation)—profoundly shaped Judaism, Christianity, and Islam, introducing concepts like resurrection, judgment, and a messiah (Saoshyant). During the Babylonian Exile, Persian Zoroastrian ideas likely influenced Jewish eschatology.
To say “the Magi are watching closely and waiting” is not to invoke some hidden power—it is to remind us that the memory of civilizations is long, and wisdom endures long after political certainties fade. In today’s context, this ancient flame illuminates the U.S.-Israel tensions and Gaza allegations: just as Zoroastrians chose asha amid chaos, modern societies must choose truth over division, confronting atrocities with justice. The Magi’s guardianship evokes a call to moral participation, warning that neglect of light—whether through ignoring genocide claims or fostering hatred—invites darkness. Zoroastrianism’s decline after the 7th-century Muslim conquest, with migrations to India forming the Parsi community, underscores resilience—today, 100,000-200,000 adherents worldwide preserve its teachings. Its emphasis on ecology, equality, and free will offers timeless lessons for navigating contemporary rifts, urging accountability in the face of international condemnations.
These themes matter spiritually because they echo across sacred texts, from Zoroastrianism to the Old Testament, the Christian Bible, and the Quran, forming a tapestry of shared human struggle for righteousness. In Zoroastrianism, the cosmic battle between good and evil is central, with humanity’s moral choices determining the triumph of light, as in the Avesta where Ahura Mazda calls for good thoughts, words, and deeds to oppose Angra Mainyu (the evil spirit). This dualism influenced Judaism during the Persian period, evident in the Old Testament’s emphasis on choosing good over evil. For example, Deuteronomy 30:15-19 presents life and death, blessings and curses, urging: “Choose life, so that you and your children may live,” highlighting free will’s role in moral order. Isaiah 5:20 warns, “Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who put darkness for light and light for darkness,” mirroring Zoroastrian light-darkness motifs and stressing the peril of moral inversion.
The “watchers” in the Old Testament, as in Daniel 4:17 where “watchers, holy ones” decree judgments, symbolize divine vigilance, akin to Zoroastrian guardians. This extends to the Christian Bible’s New Testament, where Jesus in Matthew 5:14-16 calls believers “the light of the world,” urging good deeds to glorify God, echoing Zoroastrian ethical dualism and Old Testament choices. Revelation’s apocalyptic visions of final judgment and resurrection draw from Zoroastrian eschatology, where good triumphs over evil.
In the Quran, these threads continue: Surah An-Nur 24:35 describes Allah as “the Light of the heavens and the earth,” a parable of divine guidance piercing darkness. Surah Al-Baqarah 2:257 contrasts Allah guiding from darkness to light versus Satan leading to darkness, emphasizing righteousness. Hadiths reinforce: “Truthfulness leads to righteousness, and righteousness leads to Paradise.” These interconnections matter because they reveal a universal spiritual call to moral agency—choosing light over darkness amid trials—relevant to today’s conflicts, where ignoring ethical imperatives risks cosmic imbalance.
Yet, in the shadow of potential escalations like bombing Iran, Zoroastrianism could experience a spiritual resurgence, tied to the Christian Bible’s warnings. Historical precedents show aggressions catalyze revivals; the Arab conquests suppressed Zoroastrianism, but remnants persisted as Persian identity symbols. Today, Iranian youth turn to it for ethical purity, framing reversion as ancestral faith. Bombing could unite groups under nationalism, amplifying Zoroastrian sites and philosophies, inspiring conversions. This rise—swelling adherents through awakening—stems from its peaceful alternative, defying asha’s neglect. Thus, the watchers wait for reclamation.
“When societies forget their light, the watchers do not vanish. They wait—for a generation ready to listen again.” This proverb encapsulates Zoroastrian endurance, urging us to heed ancient wisdom in modern crises, including the ethical imperatives raised by Gaza.
The Path Forward
We cannot afford apathy. The path of repair begins with education, dialogue, and courage. It means confronting antisemitism wherever it appears, not out of obligation but out of recognition that hatred unleashed never remains contained. It also means addressing allegations of genocide head-on, supporting international investigations and humanitarian aid. It means learning deeply—not just about Israel and Judaism, but about all the ancient currents that shaped our shared world, including Zoroastrianism, whose concepts of good, evil, and moral choice seeded the spiritual soil of entire civilizations. Initiatives like AJC’s Translate Hate glossary educate on antisemitic tropes, while calls for updated national strategies against hate are vital. On campuses, centers like AJC’s for Education Advocacy empower students against discrimination.
Dialogue must bridge generational gaps, fostering forums where critiques of policy—including genocide accusations—are aired without descending into hatred. Revitalizing Holocaust education and incorporating Zoroastrian influences can enrich understanding of shared ethical roots, while also teaching about contemporary conflicts. Policy-wise, conditioning U.S. aid on human rights compliance, as suggested amid UN findings, could realign the alliance with American values. Social media accountability—reforming Section 230 to curb algorithmic hate—is essential. Globally, supporting ICJ processes, two-state solutions, and countering threats like Hamas and Iran can stabilize relations. Encouraging more countries to join condemnations or push for ceasefires, as seen in joint statements from 25+ nations, builds momentum for peace. Critically, avoiding escalations like bombing Iran is paramount; such actions could deepen global unfavorability, ensuring long-term gains only for those who stand with truth and de-escalation, while sparking Zoroastrianism’s spiritual rise with biblical ties.
If we do this, the coming shift can be one of renewal, not fracture. If we do not, we may stand decades from now and wonder how a bond once thought unbreakable was allowed to fade amid unaddressed atrocities. Renewal requires collective action: communities hosting interfaith dialogues, schools teaching diverse histories including Gaza’s humanitarian crisis, and leaders condemning both antisemitism and potential genocide unequivocally.
A Threshold of Choice
The watchers stir, not to judge, but to witness. History has set the stage; the present holds the pen. Whether we build bridges or fracture fault lines depends not on distant powers, but on the choices made in classrooms, communities, and conversations today. As Zoroastrian asha reminds us, truth prevails through active participation. In this threshold moment, let us choose light over shadow, forging a future where alliances endure through understanding, justice, and accountability for all sides. Heed the warning: bombing Iran or ignoring these currents will only empower those aligned with truth, potentially sealing the alliance’s fate and ushering in Zoroastrianism’s spiritual resurgence, deeply intertwined with the Christian Bible’s moral imperatives.