The Behistun inscription carved into a cliff face in Iran.

Evidence Dependency Map

Purpose

This map prevents the living archive’s sixty-three pre-Run-32 PM exhibits from being mistaken for sixty-three independent proofs. It assigns every exhibit a lead family and an evidentiary status. Full reasoning appears in Evidence Intake 048.

Status legend

  • ROOT: source fact with its own failure condition.
  • CORROBORATOR: separate witness supporting an existing proposition.
  • SATELLITE: dependent expansion or application.
  • SYNTHESIS: conclusion assembled from earlier evidence.
  • CONTROL: governs scope or method; no added affirmative vote.
  • HOLD/X: not admitted as affirmative proof.

Family legend

Code Family
F01 Gathic Mazda source-profile
F02 Received Iranian development
F03 Achaemenid documentary environment
F04 Cross-boundary transmission receipts
F05 Classical Magian testimony
F06 Jewish moral-apocalyptic transformation
F07 Hostile-agency redistribution
F08 Gospel and Johannine target structure
F09 Composite Yahweh moral profile
F10 Christian and dualist reception
F11 Jewish–Hellenistic rival environment
F12 Method and adjudication

Complete PM crosswalk

PM Lead family Status Dependency ruling
001 F01/F08 SATELLITE comparison John 4 and Gathic Spirit/Truth roots; not independent of either endpoint
002 F01/F08 SATELLITE comparison Reuses Gathic path/life and Johannine Way/Truth/Life families
003 F02 CORROBORATOR Mithra repairs a system-level covenant objection; not Mazda’s personal identity
004 F01/F02 CORROBORATOR Gathic word plus later personification; no independent incarnation proof
005 F02 CORROBORATOR Distinct received figure; supports hearing/obedience structure only
006 F02 CORROBORATOR Moral self/deeds judgment; later Hādōxt form separately controlled
007 F01/F08 SATELLITE comparison Same Mazda–Spənta–Aša and Johannine Father-title endpoints
008 F08 CONTROL Revealed-name interpretation governs identity method; no direct Mazda evidence
009 F03/F04 ROOT control Cross-language Mazda designations establish naming permeability, not John awareness
010 F03/F08 CORROBORATOR Royal favor/glory comparison; xᵛarənah correction prevents inflation
011 F01/F02 CORROBORATOR Gathic bridge root plus later topographic control
012 F02 X Anāhitā/living-water equation rejected
013 F06 ROOT bridge Wisdom 1–2 is the root Jewish moral bridge
014 F06 SATELLITE Develops Wisdom 2’s righteous-child profile from the same work
015 F06 CORROBORATOR within work Wisdom 18 is a separate passage but not a separate authorial witness
016 F05 ROOT reception Plutarch’s creator-of-Truth report; late and Greek-mediated
017 F10 CORROBORATOR Matthew’s Magi are a canonical reception witness, not identity proof
018 F02/F08 SATELLITE comparison Delegated judgment is broad and Younger Avestan
019 F01/F02 CORROBORATOR Wholeness/Immortality pair; partially Gathic with ritual controls
020 F02 X Generic victory parallel rejected as proof
021 F02/F08 CORROBORATOR Ātar cluster is received/later and not a Son identity
022 F02 HOLD Haoma comparison remains low-grade and non-load-bearing
023 F02/F10 HOLD Heptad comparison remains broad; Revelation authorship and Zechariah controls
024 F07/F08 SYNTHESIS Built from court texts and two rewriting pairs; not an extra witness beyond them
025 F08 SYNTHESIS John 8 sequence; dependent on the same chapter used by 054 and 059
026 F07/F12 SYNTHESIS/CONTROL Taxonomy of uneven externalization; no new ancient source
027 F09 ROOT cluster Ezekiel-specific hostile and restorative profile
028 F09 SYNTHESIS Multi-book hostile-profile collection; inputs retain their own agency grades
029 F09/F07 SYNTHESIS Destructive-sovereignty catalogue plus census rewriting pair
030 F09 SYNTHESIS Individual deaths/warrior/enemy profile; overlaps 028–029
031 F09 SYNTHESIS Additional hostile-agency texts; corroborative books, not one new causal track
032 F10 ROOT reception family Establishes later separation and synthesis options only
033 F10/F05 CORROBORATOR reception Sethian Iranian coding; Arimanios remains distinct from Yaldabaoth
034 F01/F08 SATELLITE comparison Mazda/Spirit structure beside John 10; later folded into 060
035 F02/F08 CORROBORATOR Vohu Manah welcome/dwelling; does not equal Johannine reception promise
036 F09/F08 SYNTHESIS Master Jesus–Yahweh profile assembled from many rows below
037 F08/F12 CONTROL Son–Father distinction blocks category errors; no Mazda evidence
038 F09/F08 CORROBORATOR Sabbath life/kill pair; distinct episode within master profile
039 F09/F08 CORROBORATOR Satanic bondage/release; not a universal disease ontology
040 F09/F08 SATELLITE Serpent/gift resonance heavily controlled by Numbers and John 3
041 F09/F08 CORROBORATOR Outsider mercy/ḥerem comparison with internal countertraditions
042 F09/F08 CORROBORATOR Theophany/unseen-Father tension; John 12 mandatory countermodel
043 F09/F08 CORROBORATOR Rain/drought comparison; common providence versus exceptional judgment
044 F09/F08 CORROBORATOR Sanctuary/worship transformation; Jewish priority retained
045 F09/F08 CORROBORATOR Oath contrast; ambiguous “evil/evil one” not used as identity proof
046 F09/F08 CORROBORATOR Restorative purity profile; food-law repeal remains disputed
047 F09/F08 CORROBORATOR Divorce accommodation principle; Torah continuity retained
048 F09/F08 CORROBORATOR Victim-blame rejection; judgment and providence controls retained
049 F09/F08 SYNTHESIS Corporate-punishment set; overlaps earlier child/death evidence
050 F09/F08 CORROBORATOR Intercession/enemy-prayer comparison; both corpora contain limits
051 F12 CONTROL Separates proof jurisdictions; no primary evidentiary increment
052 F09/F08 SYNTHESIS Authority-method comparison; reuses warrior and shepherd sources
053 F09/F08 CONTROL/CORROBORATOR Ezekiel 34 is mandatory Yahwistic counterevidence
054 F08 ROOT analysis John 8:42 grammar; textually distinct claim within same John 8 family
055 F12 SYNTHESIS/CONTROL Twelve-door audit; adjudicates existing evidence only
056 F01 CORROBORATOR Multiple Gathic passages replicate Father-of-Aša relation; one corpus, several passages
057 F08 CORROBORATOR First John confirms works-based paternity; related Johannine tradition
058 F08/F09 CORROBORATOR Titus/Hebrews/James nondeception rule; separate NT texts, same canon environment
059 F08/F12 CONTROL John 8:54 speech-act firewall; same verse is not new evidence for itself
060 F01/F02/F08 SYNTHESIS Integrates earlier Father-family and Johannine agency exhibits
061 F01/F02/F08 SYNTHESIS Integrates Iranian and Johannine causal partition evidence
062 F11/F12 SYNTHESIS/CONTROL Tournament adjudicates existing candidates; no new ancient witness
063 F11/F12 SYNTHESIS/CONTROL Distributed rival model reorganizes earlier sources

Root network

flowchart TD
    A["Iranian source profile"] --> G["Historical genealogy"]
    B["Contact and receipts"] --> G
    C["Jewish transformation"] --> G
    D["Agency redistribution"] --> G
    G --> I["Comparative identity inference"]
    E["Johannine Father and paternity"] --> I
    F["Matched Yahweh profile"] --> I
    H["Rival-source controls"] --> I

The arrows indicate inferential dependence, not direct literary copying. Satellite exhibits sit beneath these nodes and do not create additional top-level arrows.

Independence summary

Claim Correct treatment
“There are 63 PM entries” Registry size
“There are 63 independent proofs” Rejected
“Multiple Gathic passages support Father/creator relations” Intra-corpus replication
“Paradise and Asmodeus both crossed boundaries” Two distinct transmission receipts
“Samuel–Chronicles and Exodus–Jubilees reassign agency” Two distinct rewriting pairs supporting one trend
“Many Yahwistic books attribute hostile actions” Multi-book corroboration with shared tradition and genre controls
“John and 1 John use works-based paternity” Johannine-tradition corroboration, not full independence
“Audits and tournaments prove the ancient facts again” Rejected; they control inference only

Bottom line

The archive’s evidentiary force comes from cross-domain convergence, not raw exhibit count. The nine-pillar collapsed case survives removal of several entire families while identifying the Father-of-Aša root as a genuine vulnerability whose loss would downgrade the identity verdict.

Run 33 extension

PM Lead family Status Dependency ruling
066 F01 ROOT/CORROBORATOR Yasna 37.1 is a distinct Old Avestan composition that directly assigns Aša’s creation/ordering to Mazda; it fortifies but does not become independent of the Iranian source family
067 F01/F12 SYNTHESIS/CONTROL Five-locus philological triangulation controls translation and grammar; it does not count the loci as five causal probabilities

Run 33 therefore strengthens Pillar 1 internally without increasing the nine-pillar count.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *